Posted by Gotshrimp? on December 09, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by Gotshrimp? on November 25, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I just read this article and wonder why Bill Gates is always portrait ed as a guy that got where he is today because of luck, great background, other people close to him, theft etc.? This article tries to make a case against any risk that Gates and many other successful entrepreneurs took to get them where they are today. Being one myself I like to point out that the risk this DB is referring too don't matter, it's about the responsibilities that you have as an entrepreneur everyday that bring risk and make you cautious. The people that work for you, their families and financial obligations. Its not about the fact that you switch from being employed by somebody else, that is not a risk at all. Its about ideas and will they work in the world as you know it when the idea hits the brain? Its about making your ideas become companies and everything that happens on the way to the day you make more money then you spend and how to survive in between? It about trust and loyalty and finally its about the passion that you have creating something that makes things better and are people willing to pay for what you offer. I find it strange that Mr. Gates always gets to look bad for what he did. IMHO this man made it big, made mistakes along the way, but now he is where he is look what he does with his wealth and knowledge. I like Apple more, but think Bill Gates is a modern hero, making our world, not just his a better place. Thanks Bill. Good job! Great Risk!
Posted by Gotshrimp? on November 16, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Sunday Times gains unprecedented access to the world's most powerful, and most secretive, investment bank. Article on Times online
It's not often that I agree with a banker and especially a banker that is the chief grabber at Goldman, but indeed I believe this guy is on to something. This man compares himself to God, I love it. I think the God he is referring to, is the illusion character referred to by many as God. A bearded man (Movember icon no.1) sitting in the sky surrounded by Angels and well behaved dead people. If this guy and his colleagues continue to behave the way they do he soon will be God and only surrounded by dead people and dead businesses. So I dig his story. If I was him I would do my best to be human again and turn his bank into a normal business that doesn't need help from the Devil (Think of that one for a sec). If he manages that, please give the man a 200 mio$ bonus and a bunch of hookers, Cocaine and all the young cock he yearns for while jerking of on his own image..
Posted by Gotshrimp? on November 09, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Some of you may have noticed that I no longer have a facebook page and that my myspace profile is mangled.
No, I was not hacked. I have been trying to cancel myspace for a few
weeks and was having trouble, so I destroyed what was there. I have now
reached someone there who is promising me that they will let me leave.
I have no grudge against myspace or facebook. It's hard to explain. I
just don't want to do these things anymore and I started to feel like I
had to. So I stopped. That's all.
People will tell me that that kind of networking is vital for my
career. Well, I guess I'm willing to go ahead and find out that no one
is coming to my shows because I don't have a myspace or a facebook
account. I wish all of you in the social network world a terrific
whatever you're doing. If you still want to reach me, you can come here
to my website. I will try to use the time I have freed up by killing
those things to update this page more often.
A good life, or a hard life lived well to all of you.
Louis C.K.
ps. I still have twitter.
Posted by Gotshrimp? on November 04, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Dutch article on new direction in Holland with regards to illegal downloading
The logic here is that until there are enough legal alternatives available, the Dutch law enforcement will not do anything to fight copyright infringement. Once enough alternatives are available, only the illegal providers will be prosecuted. It is a bit like lets only start to prosecute rapists once we have enough prostitutes. I have several questions like: When is the enough reached and who decides? Then the Gerd Leonard idea for a monthly fee starts to rise again, I think the minister just heard about this theory. My take on this would be to listen to mister Lessig and rethink copyright laws and start the process of legislation, so laws from a century ago will get replaced with laws that fit the current world. This instead of trying to make something out of the chaos that's currently the reality. It is no rocket science. Very funny btw, that it took a decade for politicians to wake up.
Posted by Gotshrimp? on October 30, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Saturday evening, couch potato. On TV I saw an ad from Dutch On demand website Veamer.nl. It first checks my operating system, Ai you got a Mac (Yeas I believe Mac is much better then Windows) and therefore it doesn't work with our service. Dejavu right there. When I started in the music industry with Independent IP (IIP) and started to figure how my idea of FUGA would fit this space one of the things out there was DRM (Digital Rights Management). Microsoft was the biggest in this field and many businesses started around this 'opportunity'. I asked myself if IIP should take a look at this. As a music fan I hated DRM, it did not work with my choice of hardware configuration (Mac, iPod etc.), licenses expired and user experience getting access was terrible. When looking at a new business you need to take it all in consideration, so yes I thought of this strange piece of technology and took it serious for a sunny afternoon. To make a long story short: DRM was not going to be accepted by consumers! and soon in the process also not accepted by artists. (Remember that artist that posted the hack code for his DRM CD by Sony on his website?)
The reasons where simple:
All repertoire was already available for free on illegal websites, paying for something or getting something for free that later disappears is weird and people are not always stupid when it concerns consumer behavior. Many other reasons apply.
Apple came with DRM iTunes, but the total experience and seamless integration with the iPod made DRM not the top priority.
So I go to Veamer.nl and experience that strange feeling. Especially now we are moving to film with FUGA. I have heard the reason used by people defending DRM in film. But think they are all BS and based on fear of the unknown. The exact reasons as in music apply in film. So why does the film industry not learn from the music industry? I think this is what is going on:
Microsoft and the others that offer DRM solutions to an industry are all big companies, with big lobby/sales forces. They are perceived as knowledgeable about this space and are telling people in the film industry what to do. So its all a numbers game. In the land of the blind, the giant with the one eye is the king. The good news is, that from a timing pov things look a lot more insightful.
Dear people and companies in the film industry,
You are in the business of making art. Beautiful, inspiring, entertaining funny, scary, wicked works that are going to be loved by your audience. Anything you do to frustrate that experience, will drive your audience to illegal download sites, torrents, streaming sites etc. What ever your consultants tell you about DRM, what ever you want to believe DRM is going to bring your business, Think again! Ask your kids or grand kids how they listen to their music and look at their video/film. Then take the time to observe how they really do it ;-) The thing with current technological developments is that it all goes faster. This means you should be faster to keep up. Rethink your supply chain and release strategies. When you finish a movie there are no boundaries any more. The second you make it available, its available to the world. You should dictate and dominate that process by letting go of the way you did things in the past. That all made sense at the time it got to be, but because of the internet and technologies using the internet to connect, today things are different. The reason people go to the cinema is still the same as when it started so it makes sense to release in cinemas, but it doesn't make sense not to make it available at the same time on all the other platforms. If you don't do it, some Russian, Belgium or English smart ass will film inside the cinema and puts it on line after the showing, ruining a lot of your audience to be. Not so much the cinema audience, that's a night out, but the audience online and DVD. If my friend tells me she went to the cinema and loved that movie and I dont have time or what ever to go to the cinema, I want to watch the movie online or on DVD. So the minute I have a craving, I have to wait for months before I get satisfaction. I think this is the wrong approach. IMHO ;-) When it becomes available it doesn't play on my Mac or any other device not supporting MS DRM (I believe that is a lot of devices). I will go to Watch movies online and get what I want. This time I don't feel guilty (as I did with getting music for free) because I think its pretty stupid to make the same mistake twice. Even being in an other industry isn't an excuse, you all know what happened with music. Now iTunes is DRM free and all my music can live on all my devices now and future devices I have become a loyal user and customer. I do want to pay for my content and honer the artists that made all the great music and films and so forth but have no compassion for stupid lawyers, MS salesmen and women, bean counters and other idiots that just want my money and have no compassion with me. I think my take on this might be a bit loud, but I think its shared with many people out there. They don't think of it that much and will just follow the possibilities that are out there. Unless governments world wide will enforce copy right infringements from now on any DRM strategy will just stop you from making money on the internet. Looking at the customer satisfaction for FUGA in music, I think I know what we will do for Film ;-)
Have a nice day!
Posted by Gotshrimp? on October 24, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by Gotshrimp? on October 21, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Written by John on 19/10/09
On the eve of the Amsterdam Dance Event, digital content management and delivery system FUGA has
reinforced its growing reputation with five key signings. Respected UK
dance label Toolroom Records, Europe’s fastest growing online
distribution service Record Union, leading independent distributor
Republic of Music, San Francisco based OM Records, and global music hub
WaTunes will all be moving their digital operations to the new platform.
Representing artists such as Mark Knight, David Guetta, Underworld, Faithless, Funkagenda, Dave Spoon, Dramirez, Fedde Le Grand, Richard Dinsdale, Benny Benassi, Dirty South, Jay-Z ,Mark Farina, Samantha James, Bassnectar, J-Boogie’s Dubtronic Science, Colette, Andy Caldwell and Chubb Rock, these labels and distributors will now benefit from FUGA’s innovative approach to digital distribution.
Posted by Gotshrimp? on October 19, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
Recent Comments