Next to my life as a technology entrepreneur I'm also involved in artist management or business affairs for artists. Now I have entered the music business I have learned that lots of record companies now don't want to sign artists if they don't do a so called 360 deal. Now from my point of view, where I have the interest of the artist at heart, doing a deal like that would only make sense if the company could actually add value in all of the potential revenue generating activities. Thinking of this over the last couple of years it occurred to me that the 360 model is something the 'manager' already has in place and it doesn't make a lot of sense to sign a 2nd 360 deal with a company thats not specialized in all the areas where money can be made. The argument of the record companies that they invest in artists and are responsible for putting them on the map makes kind of sense too, so what's the right way of doing business, so a win win situation is created?
My thoughts and first steps in this are that we need a new kind of management. Not the manager that takes care of business as if he/she is the center of the Universe, but more of an business angel.
My idea is to set up a company that specializes in building the business framework for creative genius / artists. Working in the global technology field, I come across Venture Capital firms all the time. My frustration with these firms is that they say they go for the entrepreneur, but in reality they just look at the numbers. Of course there are exceptions in the VC world that do base their judgment on people and ideas (they are most successful). This has inspired me to think of a new model. A fund that initiates the artist career or idea. The framework is build with 'VC' money and from that point the artist entity is connected to partners that create the required value and put the artist on the map in the specific playing field this partner is specialized in.
Artist A inc. 100% owned by artist
Investment coming in from 'VC' and involvement of business man/woman
Artist A owns 75% of Artist A inc.
Business man/woman owns 20% of Artist A inc.
VC owns 5% of Artist A inc
Now artist A inc has lets say EURO 50k in the bank, a dedicated business manager and ready to start working on career.
50K gets invested in recordings, videos etc..
Now Artist A inc start looking for partners to commercially exploit. Product is ready and all that needs to happen is distribution, marketing and sales/partnerships.
All revenue generated by artist is received by Artist A inc and artist stays in control.
I think this is the model for the future and would love to see this fly with my portfolio. Any ideas?




Recent Comments